Posts Tagged ‘Organization Development’

Where to Begin with Social Responsibility


2010
09.14

We tout ourselves as a firm that helps clients look at issues of sustainability. More specifically, we say we design and deliver leadership training that helps leaders have impact for the greater good -not only in their work-a-day worlds, but also in their communities.  If you drill into reading our marketing collateral, eventually you’ll pick up on the fact that we’re very solid in our stance on social responsibility.  Our goal is simply to help our clients generate wealth and have more impact. Like so many expressions, “social responsibility” has been politicized along with everything that begins with the letters S-O-C-I-A-L. Maybe it’s time for a new term, or maybe it’s time just to re-clarify the old one.

Here’s our definition of “Social Responsibility”:

“…an ethical and ideological approach to business that assumes sustainable profit is best achieved by taking into account the well-being of society .”

In action, social responsibility is when a business takes full accountability for its impact on society through its influence on customers/communities, employees, its supply chain and the environment.

What makes our definition unique is quite simple, we believe sustainable profit is THE key outcome of acting in a socially responsible fashion.  It’s not as if we invented the notion that profitability is tied to doing what’s right, we didn’t; companies like Starbucks, Kellogg, the Gap, Herman Miller, Novozymes and Union Pacific are proving it.

Need more detail?  Try this on for size:

Environment – Would you consider a company that examines its operations in terms of waste generation and efficient energy usage smart?  I would, and apparently so do the thousands of companies who have decided to first understand and then reduce their impact on the environment as part of their social responsibility strategy.

Employees – Would you want to invest in a company that addresses issues of culture, employee engagement and working environment as a key cost to manage for profitability or quality?  Hopefully, you answered “Yes!” because as it turns out, companies whose cultures outperform the competition also out-sell, out-deliver, out-execute and out-produce companies with less effective cultures.

Supply Chain – If costs are equal, would you rather purchase products from a company that gets it raw materials or unfinished goods from a country or organization that exploits people and the environment or one that treats people equitably and works to preserve the environment?  Duhh. In actuality, the data shows that costs don’t even have to be equal, they just have to be close to equal for consumers to make a better choice. Not bad for a society that is coming out of its worst economic downturn since The Depression!

Customers/Communities – Customers like to know that the businesses they buy products and services from invests some of its profits back in to the community, or at least that its employees are active members of the community, but that alone isn’t enough to justify corporate community investment.  Investing back in to the communities from which profit is derived is simple ecology; if we feed that which nourishes us, it will grow and continue to nourish us. Neglect it or exploit it without caring for it and it eventually dies or becomes sick.

How do you decide where to begin?  Each of our clients has a different social responsibility entry point, and every one of them is making progress.  Our recommendation is this: begin where the greatest gains can be made in terms of profit.  If you’re in a business where there is market share to be won, go after top-line profitability (customers/community).  If the issue is quality, product or service performance, consider starting with employees.  Are costs creeping up faster than the market can bear?  Look for ways to increase efficiency, reduce the amount of stuff you send to the landfill or reduce your energy footprint. Let’s begin by calling “Social Responsibility” what it is – a mechanism to do well by doing good.

Legacy Employees- Bringing Out their Best


2010
06.07

In every organizational change effort in which we have participated, one of the most complicated elements of the transformation is what to do with legacy employees who have been passed-over by time and circumstance.  In their prime, they were key contributors to the business but as it changed – they didn’t. At this point, they are more often referred to as obstacles instead of as supporters.  Thankfully, we work for companies who don’t just dispose of their legacy employees when they are past their prime, but not doing so makes retaining or slowly transitioning legacy employees that much more complicated. Here’s what we’ve learned and what we have seen work:

  • Legacy employees whose performance is suffering know it. They may deny or hide their awareness of this because they aren’t sure what happened, but almost without exception, they know. Therefore, when you find the legacy employee a job that more suits their skills and interests, they are enormously relieved, even if the move is tough on their egos.
  • The people who are most impacted by legacy employee’s  performance problems are usually their successors.  Involve the successor in supporting and even sponsoring the legacy employees’ transition into a new role.  Don’t make the successor responsible for managing their performance but involve them in finding a way to move the employee to a more productive position. Too often, we have seen managers who are not close enough to the situation make decisions about where and how to move the employee, and it doesn’t work.
  • Most legacy employees are willing to take a pay cut, if doing so means also taking a position that has less stress or other non-tangible rewards.
  • Some legacy employees can become excellent mentors and trainers, but only if someone shows them how.  Give them additional experience and training in how to increase their effectiveness teaching and coaching others.
  • Don’t hide the truth from them.  Sugar coating or lying to them about why you are moving them to a different position does them and everyone around them a disservice.  Being honest doesn’t imply one has to be mean, but it is better to be direct that to create a false impression.
  • Finally and most importantly, don’t avoid dealing with legacy employees whose performance is impeding the rest of the organization. We have seen one solitary legacy employee  stall  change efforts for organizations of 500 people and larger simply because their senior managers or owners were afraid or uncomfortable dealing with them. Doing so creates huge animosity among other employees which causes even more problems.

Found other things that are important when dealing with legacy employees?  Have questions?  Leave a message – start a conversation!

The New Normal – Bring-On the Death of Organizational Development


2010
05.24

Here’s an  invitation to people who do what we do: Let’s put ourselves out of business by teaching our clients to do what we do. What do you say? C’mon, it won’t hurt anything but our pride to stop acting like experts and empower our clients. After all, they always were the experts.

What our clients ask us to do is to take a look at their organizations through a meta-lens – to see the forest through the trees, and decide how to intervene to make things better. Like the millions of other OD practitioners in the world, we’re  hired to optimize the best patterns of performance in an organization while minimizing or resolving the areas where performance is low.

But wait, isn’t that the job of every leader?  You bet!

Our work should be about helping leaders develop the traits that enable them to operate like organizational development experts.  Is this approach novel?  Not really.  Is it popular with businesses?  More so all the time. “Organizational Development” is being replaced by what we call “consultative leadership” .

Consultative leadership is the art of assessing what IS and knowing how to involve, engage and otherwise influence the people involved in the process to sustainably improve it. By implementing change in this way, the people involved learn new skills and develop the muscle that makes  the process generative.  Consultative leadership is the opposite of the leader-as-hero model where leaders parachute in to problem situations in their business and, through a series of expertly ordered dictates and decisions, singlehandedly transform  a process or problem.  Parachutist leaders work well and quickly – but no one learns or develops in the process.  Organizational Development doesn’t happen.

To bring about the death of OD in organizations, I recommend we start doing the following:

  • Measure a leader’s effectiveness as much for How they achieve results as IF they achieve results.  Are they mentoring , coaching and otherwise developing their replacements while simultaneously posting great results? It’s possible to do both. In today’s environment, it’s necessary.
  • Raise the bar on your expectations. Delighting the customer isn’t exceptional anymore.  It’s standard. Are teams able to work without the full time involvement of their leader, or are they addicted to having a heroic leader who wears a big parachute lead them? Hold your management team accountable to build capacity, not just solve problems or delight the customer.
  • Spend more time helping your leaders to see the meta-picture of your organization. Once their vision has improved, start encouraging them to develop management practices that engage their people in designing and implementing change.
  • Be ready to reassign people to play to their best strengths.  Some leaders won’t be able or even willing to make the change from an expert parachutist to a consultative leader. If they can’t or are unwilling to, help them find a role that will serve the business, and your customers, better.

Put us out of business. If you have your own OD department, put them out of business, too. Imagine how much you’ll save!  There are plenty of other things we can do with our time (like helping other clients learn how to do what you’re doing).  Who knows, you may have some highly capable consultative leaders in your OD department who are itching for a chance to manage a piece of your business.

The competitive advantage of having an agile and self-sustaining organizational culture will eventually be the new norm.  Between now and that undefined point in time when it is, the organization that develops OD capability  will have a huge leg-up on their competitors.  Ask Google. Ask the new HP. Ask Herman Miller. Ask IDEO.

Define the new norm. It won’t be cheap, but neither is hiring us.

Let me hear from you! – Jim Morris